EDC 665 - Week 13 Blog

In your current professional environment, how are educational experiences or programs assessed? Is the evidence collected from the assessment used to inform change? Why or why not do you think this occurs?

In my current professional environment, the educational experiences and programs are assessed in a few ways; as a school team, as an individual teacher, and at the district level. In our school district, we use PLC's (professional learning communities) where our teachers run the show and discuss progams and all educational experiences that affect our students in a wide setting with everyone involved, in grade level meetings, and in cross-grade level meetings. The universality of the prorgam is fantastic. We created norms to follow when in attendance and we follow up with major events regularly to assure what we are implementing is valid and necessary. For example, we have used PLC's to determine how money should be spent on our supplies, music program, Gifted Students, Physical Education, etc. Teachers are the first to have a say at school decisions and how we run specific programs unique to our site.

As an individual teacher, I am responsible for creating educational experiences for my students and I am lucky to have a school administrator and district that allows individual teachers the luxury of creating these experiences. Within my classroom, as long as I am supportive to my fellow team members (other teachers) and teach the standards, I can teach freely. I am not expected to jump through any hoops within the classroom. Because of this luxury, I have free reign to expose my students to fabulous programs. For example, I love teaching language arts with chapter books to my fourth graders. They equally love the non-scripted approach and flexibility to read a book they had a say in selecting. The point is to get them reading... not to teach them to dislike it!

At the district level, many decisions are made about programs that are out of our control... usually tying somewhere with money. For example, some years we have instructional vocal music and some years we do not. We don't have a P.E. program but we certainly teach our own students all because the money was not available. Professional development is incredibly helpful but we don't receive a lot of funding based on our demographics and location.

Evidence from assessments are absolutely used to inform change. If a program is not working and the outcomes are not the expected outcomes, or outcomes we didn't expect but showing growth, we are quick to re-group and change route. Teaching and school districts must be about change. If they are not, the growth will not be seen in the consumers (students). Given our actual assessment data, we saw a need for increased writing support. Our district and school adopted the Lucy Calkin's program of writing and is now training teachers in this fashion. It has been a huge success. On another note, conceptual understanding and problem solving is a huge push in math this year. I was on the CUPS committee and saw little value in the program. While the concepts are certainly important to review, it was not a good use of money and needed to be re-worked. The outcomes and assessment did not produce good results, thus informing the much needed change. I think that our district and school site uses assessment to inform change because time is not only of the essence, but it is the responsibility of an educational institution to support their students in the greatest possible way while being respective of the tax dollars they are spending. While corruption and disagreements can arise, it seems to be a fluid process within our district and I am proud to have a teaching position in the midst of great and conscious change.